{"id":42,"date":"2014-06-02T14:23:06","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T20:23:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/?page_id=42"},"modified":"2014-06-02T14:23:06","modified_gmt":"2014-06-02T20:23:06","slug":"14er-list-chaos","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/?page_id=42","title":{"rendered":"14er List Chaos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Exactly how many 14ers are there in Colorado?\u00a0Technically there are probably around 80 highpoints that exceed 14,000 feet.\u00a0 However, there were times in the past when less than 50\u00a0peaks were recognized as official summits.\u00a0 More recently the numbers seem to range between 52 and 58 peaks.\u00a0 \u00a0So the question becomes, what defines a mountain?\u00a0 When I was young I\u00a0learned about\u00a0two criteria that were used:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>First, there is the 300&#8242; rise rule.\u00a0 That is, if you rise 300 feet from the lowpoint in the connecting ridge between you and your highest neighbor, then you qualify as a distinct peak.<\/li>\n<li>Second, was the 1 mile of separation rule.\u00a0 The idea was that you had to be at least 1 mile from any mountain higher than you to be considered a distinct peak.\u00a0 It seems to me this rule has been ignored for a long time.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>So, assuming that we ignore the second &#8220;rule of separation&#8221;, and we just go with the &#8220;rule of rise&#8221; then it is easy.\u00a0 53 peaks in Colorado qualify as officially ranked 14ers.\u00a0 So why was a list of 52 so common years ago?\u00a0 Well, they left out Unnamed\u00a0Pt. 14,081.\u00a0 Sure, it rose 301 feet from it&#8217;s connecting saddle with Kit Carson, but perhaps as a remnant of the &#8220;rule of separation&#8221;, it was discounted because it is a mere .2 miles from Kit Carson, or maybe there is just something unsatisfying about climbing unnamed points.\u00a0 When viewed from a distance, Unnamed\u00a0Pt. 14,081 does not really distinguish itself and just looks to be a lump on the greater Kit Carson Mountain.\u00a0 However, sometime after the Challenger disaster in 1987, Unnamed Pt. 14,081 was officially renamed Challenger Pt., and since then, and with the preeminence of the 300&#8242; rule to define a peak, its status as an official 14er is pretty much set.<\/p>\n<p>So if we have explained where the lists of 52 and 53 14ers come from, what about the list of 54 and 55?\u00a0 To explain these variations, first we need to go back and drop Challenger Pt. from our list to get back down to 52.\u00a0 Two 14ers that that do not meet either of the two aforementioned rules are North Maroon and El Diente.\u00a0 I am not completely sure why these two peaks are given exempt status, but by any route they are difficult climbs that clearly deserve status as\u00a0officially ranked\u00a0peaks.\u00a0 So I call them the sentimental favorites.\u00a0 Only a true math and numbers person would remotely consider calling for example Mt. Bross more deserving of ranked status than North Maroon\u00a0 (Of course you could apply this same logic to North Massive and Sunlight Spire, but that has not been done yet).\u00a0 So that is where we get the list of 54 from.\u00a0 Take the standard 52 and add the sentimental favorites El Diente and North Maroon.\u00a0 Then, to get to 55 you add Challenger back on to the list of 54.<\/p>\n<p>I used to go with the list of 55.\u00a0 Then 14ers.com came along and was using a list of 58 that included 3 summits that are pretty easy when done with their taller neighbors.\u00a0 At first I thought it was a little ridiculous to include Cameron, Conundrum, and North Eolus.\u00a0 However, after I understood the criteria I liked it because it was decidedly simple.\u00a0 On this list to be an officially ranked 14er you simply have to have a name officially assigned by the United States Geological Survey (USGS).\u00a0 I like the simplicity of the criteria so that is the list that I will go with.<\/p>\n<p>For purposes of setting 14er records, it seems there is a long standing tradition to go with the officially recognized 14ers of the day.\u00a0 Currently I think 55 or 58 still stand up to scrutiny, although if the record is set with 58, then likely future record setters would choose to go with that list as well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exactly how many 14ers are there in Colorado?\u00a0Technically there are probably around 80 highpoints that exceed 14,000 feet.\u00a0 However, there were times in the past when less than 50\u00a0peaks were recognized as official summits.\u00a0 More recently the numbers seem to range between 52 and 58 peaks.\u00a0 \u00a0So the question becomes, what defines a mountain?\u00a0 When &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/?page_id=42\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;14er List Chaos&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/42"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/42\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49,"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/42\/revisions\/49"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/andrewhamilton.com\/14ers\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}